Quoth the Rodent Queen, "Squeak."

They weren't cows inside. They were waiting to be, but they forgot. Now they see sky, and they remember what they are.
*dies*

*dies*

(Source: effyeahrats, via many-splendored-rat)

afternoonsnoozebutton:

trextrying:

T-Rex Trying To Paint His House

No wonder he’s so angry.

Aw, poor guy. :(

afternoonsnoozebutton:

trextrying:

T-Rex Trying To Paint His House

No wonder he’s so angry.

Aw, poor guy. :(

(via brosephstalin)

Look, if we’re going to say that embryos and fetuses are people, then they still have to be held to our standards of law.

sanityscraps:

If an embryo or fetus and I have the same exact rights, then that means, that just as I don’t have the right to use someone’s body against their will, neither does a fetus. If you’re going to say a fetus does have that right, then you’re saying that fetuses are more important than other people who can actually suffer from an unwanted pregnancy.

And no, a fetus doesn’t have the right to use someone’s body against their will even when the “right to life” is brought into the equation. By that logic, since the right to life supersedes bodily autonomy, if I need a kidney, I can kidnap and/or kill a random person to get it. My right to life is more important than their bodily autonomy, after all, right?

That proposition is repulsive. If you don’t find it repulsive, then you should. You have to consent to an organ donation—unless you become pregnant, anyway.

^^^^^ Exactly.

unfriendlyatheist:



If we contemplate in the shape of the fingers at the back of the left hand we will find out Amazingly, That it draws the shape of a TURKEY

unfriendlyatheist:

If we contemplate in the shape of the fingers at the back of the left hand we will find out Amazingly, That it draws the shape of a TURKEY

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

(Source: leylahur)

A more exact abortion analogy

religiousragings:

In light of some of the weaknesses that were pointed out in my previous analogy, I’m revising it as follows.

Suppose you woke up one day and found yourself attached by tubes to another living thing, and then you are told that this other living thing will die if you disconnect the tubes.  You, however, carry a low risk of injury if the tubes are removed by professionals.  You could easily die if you try to pull the tubes out yourself, however.  You, however, did not in any way want this living thing connected to you.

Supposed that you knew that this possibility was a known risk of being around another person that you love and interacting with this person in a historically normal manner. (The risk was compared to being like that of a sky diver by a commenter, but I feel that it would be hard to improve on this analogy.)  Your selection of people to love becomes limited if you do not choose to interact with them in a historically normal manner.

For a length of time, this other life that you are hooked up to is a houseplant, which then becomes an insect, which then becomes a turtle, and then (at some point close to 9 months) becomes a cute kitten, and then, at 9 months, becomes a full human being.

Please bear in mind that at every stage, even at the houseplant stage, the other living thing is a full POTENTIAL human being.  The houseplant has a 41% chance of reaching the human stage (based on success rates of in vitro fertilization).  If it makes you feel better, you can make the houseplant look exactly like an embryo.

If you are religious, you may try to imbue this houseplant with a human soul.  I am not religious however, and this argument will not work with me.  There is no scientific evidence for a soul whatsoever, nor is there ANY biblical support that a child in any stage of fetal development has a soul.  This contention would be based solely on unsupported opinion.

At any stage, you could lose friends or family if they find out that you have become tethered.  You could also lose your job.  The longer you wait, the greater the risk to your health it becomes.

Would you elect to carry this other life with you until it became a human being?

I suspect that this analogy will be somewhat more contentious than my first, but I strongly believe that it is much more accurate.  :)

~ Steve

neotheist:

religiousragings:

asfatasthat:

‘Cause I’m about tired of beleivers and non-beleivers alike anymore.

As an agnostic atheist, I’m not sure if I should take offense at this or not.  O.o

I’ll “shut the fuck up” when religion stops damaging the human race.
Methinks someone doesn’t know the definition of “agnostic”.

neotheist:

religiousragings:

asfatasthat:

‘Cause I’m about tired of beleivers and non-beleivers alike anymore.

As an agnostic atheist, I’m not sure if I should take offense at this or not.  O.o

I’ll “shut the fuck up” when religion stops damaging the human race.

Methinks someone doesn’t know the definition of “agnostic”.

(Source: tajh831, via igoblind)

(Source: atheistme)

religiousragings:

Evidence and stuff

religiousragings:

Evidence and stuff

(via ihateallyourgods)

religiousragings:

Don’t you believe in anything?
Love, kindness, acceptance, and a lot of other pretty things too.  :)

religiousragings:

Don’t you believe in anything?

Love, kindness, acceptance, and a lot of other pretty things too.  :)

(Source: atheism-)

Holy fuck, is that Gmork?!?

Holy fuck, is that Gmork?!?

(via mclobsters)

religiousragings:

newtonpwns:

I say “may the force be with you”

“May the force be achoo”

I prefer “Gesundheit” and “A ta souet (aw gorrammit, I can’t spell French)”, both of which are wishes of health.

religiousragings:

newtonpwns:

I say “may the force be with you”

“May the force be achoo”

I prefer “Gesundheit” and “A ta souet (aw gorrammit, I can’t spell French)”, both of which are wishes of health.

(Source: atheism-shitthatblows)

unfriendlyatheist:

And this is coming from someone that 
Will never be pregnant
Has never had sex
Has probably never seen a vagina
Has probably never seen childbirth 
Has no idea what unwanted pregnancy entails 
Definitely has no idea what unwanted child raising requires
Also definitely has no idea what burdens his shitty religion is placing on women
Will never get anyone pregnant
If he did actually get someone pregnant, would have enough money for everything plus extra
Won’t even allow women into his clergy, much less pregnant ones
I mean, come on. What chances does this idiot have of getting anything regarding women’s reproductive health care right, much less condemning them with the blanket generalization of being selfish and afraid?
Seriously. Is this the best person to be deciding women’s futures for them? 

unfriendlyatheist:

And this is coming from someone that 

  1. Will never be pregnant
  2. Has never had sex
  3. Has probably never seen a vagina
  4. Has probably never seen childbirth 
  5. Has no idea what unwanted pregnancy entails 
  6. Definitely has no idea what unwanted child raising requires
  7. Also definitely has no idea what burdens his shitty religion is placing on women
  8. Will never get anyone pregnant
  9. If he did actually get someone pregnant, would have enough money for everything plus extra
  10. Won’t even allow women into his clergy, much less pregnant ones

I mean, come on. What chances does this idiot have of getting anything regarding women’s reproductive health care right, much less condemning them with the blanket generalization of being selfish and afraid?

Seriously. Is this the best person to be deciding women’s futures for them? 

(Source: inchristhopeisfound, via thatbeardedatheist-deactivated2)